problem with ACDSEE 4
- Thread starter ficelle
- Start date
Try this Serial No;
711-108-595-288-491-441
711-108-595-288-491-441
I gave up ACDSee 4. Eats so much memory, its slow, intrusive with that InTouch shit, and lacks one of the most useful plugins from previous versions: lightbox. I have ACDsee 3.1 powerpack (and it's already ugly GUI) installed just because of this plugin.
Another very good tool is CompuPic Pro 6.1.1223. There are keygens for this proggie.
And, of course, IrfanView.
Cheers!
Another very good tool is CompuPic Pro 6.1.1223. There are keygens for this proggie.
And, of course, IrfanView.
Cheers!
it depends on where you stand. if you only have couple hundred images in a directory, then 3.1 is good enough. but if you have a lot a lot of images (me) you'll know that 4 is the way to go.
why? easy, you try to browse through the directory with 3.1 that has couple thousand images... what happens? bam, the app craps out.
don't believe me, try it out for yourself. oh, and it's the same for media files too. when it's over a gig or so, it'll crap. (not sure on the exact size)
why? easy, you try to browse through the directory with 3.1 that has couple thousand images... what happens? bam, the app craps out.
don't believe me, try it out for yourself. oh, and it's the same for media files too. when it's over a gig or so, it'll crap. (not sure on the exact size)
Imagebrowsers
hello Ficelle
This link h**p://www.moneys2008.com/down/elist.php?cid=67
goes to a imagebrowserspage, ther you can get ACDSee 4 with
a working serial or keygen.
Also you can try compupic pro 6.1 wich is faster than ACDSee, but they are diferent programs. so you can find ACDSee maybe more user friendly, but compupic has more functionality, like image-smoothing and dithering, a wallpaperchanger and better image
editing features. hopes that this will help you out. Have fun!!
hello Ficelle
This link h**p://www.moneys2008.com/down/elist.php?cid=67
goes to a imagebrowserspage, ther you can get ACDSee 4 with
a working serial or keygen.
Also you can try compupic pro 6.1 wich is faster than ACDSee, but they are diferent programs. so you can find ACDSee maybe more user friendly, but compupic has more functionality, like image-smoothing and dithering, a wallpaperchanger and better image
editing features. hopes that this will help you out. Have fun!!
Wich imagebrowser is better?
Take a look on this page and try out for yourself h**p://www.moneys2008.com/down/elist.php?cid=67 Hafe fun!!
Well i'm using ACDSee 3.1 on a Pll-350 with 512mb ram and a 5400 rpm maxtor drive, and had never the problems with it that i'm reading in this thread. I'm using it daily with directory's with more than 21000 images, and bigger than 1 gig. Compupic pro 6.1 is faster and have more functionality, such as a wallpaperchanger and more and better image editing tools. ACDSee 4 is in my opinion SLOwer than the above imagebrowsersnomis_nehc said:
Take a look on this page and try out for yourself h**p://www.moneys2008.com/down/elist.php?cid=67 Hafe fun!!
freejnr
1
why???
I understand personal pref's and all - BUT why do you want to have image editing on a img viewer in the first place?....call me stupid
but is that not Photoshops/fireworks/PSP job to edit the images??...
I have never used anything other than acdsee classic, and imho it does the job of a v.good img viewer, no bloatware and all. - unlike acdsee 4 and its fast?
oh well prolly get flamed now
I understand personal pref's and all - BUT why do you want to have image editing on a img viewer in the first place?....call me stupid
but is that not Photoshops/fireworks/PSP job to edit the images??...I have never used anything other than acdsee classic, and imho it does the job of a v.good img viewer, no bloatware and all. - unlike acdsee 4 and its fast?
oh well prolly get flamed now
freejnr
I don't call you stupid because you're right. But if you view images it is handy that you can edit some little basic things like light, dark, color, crop etc. and don't have to leave the progam, and startup another. Still for major editing you can use the adobe progam. Another program that is more userfriendly than adobe photoshop and not as heavy, is Ulead photo-impact 7.
Have fun M8
I don't call you stupid because you're right. But if you view images it is handy that you can edit some little basic things like light, dark, color, crop etc. and don't have to leave the progam, and startup another. Still for major editing you can use the adobe progam. Another program that is more userfriendly than adobe photoshop and not as heavy, is Ulead photo-impact 7.
Have fun M8
acdsee 4 is definitely very slow. corel draw 10 needs less memory, while it's a professional programme, while acdsee is just crap. version 3.x was pretty good, fast and good for viewing purposes, if you wanted to view many pictures. but acdsee 4 is too slow for everything. I think I'll delete it and use version 3 for viewing pictures and corel draw 10 (photo paint) for altering pictures or whatever else
ACDSee 4 went the same OverBloated way that WS_FTP_Pro 6.7 turned into the PORKY 7.x versions...
(The only good thing around what WS did in ruining their software is it forced me to look elsewhere and after I couldnt find KG's/Patches, etc. for IglooFTP after the 2.x series I found and fell in love with SmartFTP )
Which is why I still keep a nice sweet copy of 3.x around because it rocks on win9x to winXP and everything inbetween... Nothing faster or more complete in a combo.
(btw, just because Im curious - has anyone used or found a keygen or such for a recent version of IglooFTP ? I was kinda curious as to how its doing these days)
(The only good thing around what WS did in ruining their software is it forced me to look elsewhere and after I couldnt find KG's/Patches, etc. for IglooFTP after the 2.x series I found and fell in love with SmartFTP )
Which is why I still keep a nice sweet copy of 3.x around because it rocks on win9x to winXP and everything inbetween... Nothing faster or more complete in a combo.
(btw, just because Im curious - has anyone used or found a keygen or such for a recent version of IglooFTP ? I was kinda curious as to how its doing these days)